Latest News from Positive Action in Housing

Yoker tenant shelters neighbour from dawn raid

November 30, 2006 · 1 Comment

At seven o’clock on Sunday 26th November, in the Plean Street tower block complex on the west of Glasgow, ten immigration ‘enforcers’ and Strathclyde Police officers tried to smash open the door of a single mother from Uganda and her three year old twins. Fortunately Mary was not in the flat when they eventually managed to break the door open. The police then tried to force her Scottish neighbours, living next-door, to let them in to their flat so they could search for Mary and her children. Despite being threatened through the letter-box and their door being repeatedly thumped by the insistent police, Mary’s neighbour, Linda, 45, refused to let the dawn raid team in.

Whilst this was happening on the 12th floor, neighbours, friends, church ministers and supporters from the Kingsway flats arrived outside the tower block but were stopped by the concierge as he claimed they would “disturb people living in the flats” (unlike the thugs wearing black, in body armour and trying to break someone’s door open, of course.). As the crowd grew, the police abandoned their attempts to take Mary and her children and departed in the dawn raid van, leaving only a sergeant from Strathclyde Police and an immigration official to wait for Mary’s front door to be sealed by a council carpenter. The BBC reported that the First Minister was “expected to raise concerns about the use of dawn raids”.

Eventually the police left. Mary’s courage, the bravery of her neighbour Linda Keily and the quick response by local people and supporters stopped this dawn raid. However, later on Sunday afternoon, Linda, 45, who has lived in Plean Street, Yoker for 16 years received a visit from a police officer. She told us:

“About lunch time a policeman or an immigration official came to the door saying what I had done was wrong and that I put Mary’s benefits into jeopardy. I told him her benefits wouldn’t be in jeopardy if you didn’t remove her the way you did. He then said I could be prosecuted, that what I did was wrong, and its against the law to give refuge to asylum seekers. He asked me would I do it again, I said I would do it again for anyone because they’re not criminals, they didn’t have to be removed that way. I told him I don’t agree with the brutal force with which they remove people from the house, especially women and children, and what was the government doing to stop this. He was saying that they could of got a warrant they would of enforced it and broken down my door as well. I told him, I’m a UK citizen; you’re not going through my door. Then he said I was obstructing the course of justice. I said so what? And slammed the door in his face”.

If ordinary people like Linda can stand up for what’s right then surely the First Minister of Scotland can defend Scotland’s interests and the human rights of Scottish asylum families, many of whom have been here for as long as six years.

After all, this is no small issue, 1,000 asylum families in Glasgow are affected. Scotland’s future lifeblood is being forcibly sent back because of a Westminster dictated asylum policy.

In October 2006, Scottish protests forced a four week suspension of enforced removals. Some senior police officers had voiced disquiet about involving their officers in the raids. Raids had had to be abandoned because of protests. As a result of the suspension, children as young as eight no longer kept watch at their windows for the dawn raid vans from six o clock onwards till it was time to go to school. Asylum families could sleep in relative peace. A few days later, Home Office minister Liam Byrne visited Scotland. He announced that two new specialist asylum teams would deal with cases in Scotland to reduce the need for dawn raids against ‘failed’ asylum seekers. He claimed faster decisions were fairer decisions and that “a case owner” would “build up a relationship with the individual and the family.” There was talk of close consultation with health and education officials to protect children and avoid dawn raids.

On the day of his visit, Mr Byrne was met with protests at the Scottish Parliament, Glasgow City chambers and then at the home Office’s reporting centre in Brand Street, Govan. He left Scotland in no doubt that Scottish asylum families are needed and wanted here but that the policy of enforced removals is not.

Publicly, the Scottish executive looked like they had done their bit. The BBC reported that the First Minister was “expected to raise concerns about the use of dawn raids”. Publicly it looked like Byrne had intervened to make dawn raids less likely.

Not quite. As soon as Byrne left Scottish soil, the Glasgow Immigration Enforcement Team resumed its brutal practise of raiding people’s homes in the early hours of the following Monday morning.

So where was the consultation with health and education to protect the interests of children? These alongside the Scottish Executive’s ‘concerns’ seemed to have evaporated. Instead it was business as usual for the snatch squads. Dragging sleeping children from their beds, handcuffing their parents, terrifying neighbours at dawn against a back drop of growing protests in local communities where asylum seekers have become over the years part and parcel of the life of Scottish communities.

Positive Action in Housing predicted one year ago that communities would resist these tactics on their own doorsteps. One year on that is exactly what is happening in Kingsway, and Yoker, Northwest of Glasgow. Members of the local community now carry out dawn patrols on the look out for dawn raid vans in their community. If the vans are seen residents are alerted and people gather outside to peacefully protest. These protests have often led to dawn raids being abandoned. Scottish tenants are now at the forefront of the campaign to end dawn raids. Long may it continue until this brutal practice stops for good. The pressure must grow

Categories: against dawn raids

1 response so far ↓

  • Dee // December 8, 2006 at 2:04 pm

    BRAVO! I take my hat off to Linda and residents of her community for their brave actions against inhuman treatment of asylum seekers.

    If British nationals had been forced to flee to another country for refuge, the Home Office would never approve of such treatment of their own nationals!

    Now the question is…..are the human rights of one person more significant than another’s? I don’t think so! Human rights are to be respected for everyone regardless of their status!

    If someone has fled persecution and death in their home country, how is brutal removal helpful?

    Does it not open up the very wounds that asylum seekers are trying to heal and send them back to die?

    How many asylum seekers have had a truly FAIR TRIAL? The term “failed asylum seeker” does not always mean that their cases have been considered on their own individual merit. The term does not mean that their reasons for seeking asylum are irrelevant either.It merely means that their case has been bunched up with others and subject to an umbrella ruling pertaining to their country of origin at the time!

    If it was about individuals, you would not have asylum seekers whose families have been killed, whose homes have been destroyed, who have been raped repeatedly, whose bodies are scared from brutal torture or whose lives are threatened by corrupt governments being detained and deported! You would not have mothers giving birth at home alone because they are denied basic NHS treatment!

    Each case is different, people have had different experiences of brutality but the Home Office NEVER considers this. Even if they have a court hearing, the decision is already made before!

    The media has painted a grave image of asylum seekers that is often far from the truth. Most asylum seekers are educated, law-abidding citizens that can make a valuable contribution to our economy. In cases where asylum seekers have resorted to crime, which I strongly oppose, it is because they are not allowed to get any sustenance from the government. A substancial number DO NOT WANT BENEFITS, they want to work, pay taxes, make NI contributions and when the situation in their home coumtries changes, they want to go back voluntarily. The irony of it all is that most countries they flee from are former British colonies! So they have a british education and could benefit this country. The Home Office needs to consider each individual case and allow those who would make our country better to stay.

    We can change the mission of the Home Office; right now it is to make life here as unbearable as possible and send them back to the hell they thought they had escaped and to send them back like animals!

    What JUSTICE is there? None, that is why action is needed.

    Lets help asylum seekers to be heard because most of them are too frightened to protest. They are frightened, not because they do not know their rights, but because the Home Office bullies them with the threat of detention and deportation. Its up tp you and I to protest on their behalf.

Leave a Comment